Thursday, August 21, 2008

Those were the Halcyon days

"Five were the years
that we had to bear!'

These two lines made me smile in retrospection, for it contrast wit the very image and impression these last five years left on me

We used to complain a lot about how things works in the institute, especially the pedagogy - fewer classes and more self studies, more projects and cases rather than firm theories. Now that I can look at it from an objective point of view, being no longer in the system, I realise what this particular method of pedagogy meant: rather than confusing the professor and making their life miserable, we have more time to question ourselves and reflect and go forward in a journey of self discovery and actualization. And that is as it should be, the teacher must only guide and the student must do the walking.

Not surprisingly, students go to all sorts of direction with their interest, and not only from the academic point of view. Exams are no longer of importance, for it is the gyan that takes front seat. It is funny how they manage to pass exams by studying just the day before the exam. But then, on deeper thought, exams are not to test our knowledge, but our cleverness. I wished I were still at school where all these things are straightforward: they ask questions and we answer. It was not so simple in engineering or mba: they ask questions and either we remain silent or we rant. lol

Well, that was what we wrote on our answer papers: rants. I wonder if any of our answer paper got checked; to get through all the 'diatribes on paper' of each and every student would be excruciatingly painful, even for the most patient of professor; my sympathies go to the professors and their assistants who actually does the checking of answers. Who in their rightful mind would want to read through boring tirades of shares and bonds from 50 different viewpoints? But that was the beauty of it! Multiple different viewpoints; we were not marshaled to think in only one direction or one solution, as we would have otherwise, in a formal theoretical pedagogy! That is what we called innovative thinking! Edison did it, we did too.

In reflection, I see a wholesome experience abundant with freedom, liberty and equality in terms of what we want to learn and what we actually learned. And I believe that such quality of education I would not have found anywhere, and that is why I am glad as glad can be, that I once walked in those hallowed hall of freedom learning!

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

thats called hitting the nail on the head of the coffin....

johney said...

@pani
It was hard, but it had to end it that way.
Thanks for reading. :p

sanjay said...

It is changing now.

Well it was not bad, it was not good, it was what it was. All i know now we could have been better but we are not bad because we were there.

I would that i would love to be in that no holds barred environment again.

You can 'compare' or more correctly differentiate.

johney said...

@sanjay

Perhaps, but let us not go into the subjunctive mood and speculate what might have happened had it been otherwise.

On the contrary, we must take it that what did happened happened because it could not have happened in any other way.

Oh, wait, scratch that. I am suppose to have a positive approach from now on.

Yes, we could have been better, but we are not so far worse off. And for that we must be glad.

sanjay said...

hmm right.
i wonder why i keep repeating the same words. :)

Sanjeev said...

In the end, the plethora of vieiwpoints or 'diatribes' converged into similar quantifiable entities within our marksheets. Nature has its own way of balancing the numerous equations coexisting within it, so does our institute. This is commendable according to me.
It could not have been better because we learnt more from our freedom than we could have from any rigorous pedagogy.